Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic and modern relevance logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Syllogistic Logic with Complements
This paper continues the development of complete fragments of natural language by adding a noun-level complement operator to the basic syllogistic language of All X are Y and Some X are Y : in the fragment of this paper we can also say, for example, Some non-X are Y . We axiomatize this logic of this fragment in two ways: in a direct fashion, allowing the inference of an arbitrary sentence from...
متن کاملSyllogistic Logic with Comparative Adjectives
This paper adds comparative adjectives to the known systems of syllogistic logic. The comparatives are interpreted by transitive and irreflexive relations. The main point is to obtain sound and complete axiomatizations of the logics.
متن کاملIntersecting Adjectives in Syllogistic Logic
The goal of natural logic is to present and study logical systems for reasoning with sentences of (or which are reasonably close to) ordinary language. This paper explores simple systems of natural logic which make use of intersecting adjectives; these are adjectives whose interpretation does not vary with the noun they modify. Our project in this paper is to take one of the simplest syllogisti...
متن کاملA Modern Syllogistic Method in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic with Realistic Tautology
The Modern Syllogistic Method (MSM) of propositional logic ferrets out from a set of premises all that can be concluded from it in the most compact form. The MSM combines the premises into a single function equated to 1 and then produces the complete product of this function. Two fuzzy versions of MSM are developed in Ordinary Fuzzy Logic (OFL) and in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic (IFL) with these...
متن کاملToward Probabilistic Natural Logic for Syllogistic Reasoning
Natural language contains an abundance of reasoning patterns. Historically, there have been many attempts to capture their rational usage in normative systems of logical rules. However, empirical studies have repeatedly shown that human inference differs from what is characterized by logical validity. In order to better characterize the patterns of human reasoning, psychologists have proposed a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Synthese
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0039-7857,1573-0964
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-014-0631-y